🔗 Share this article

Critics have charged British American Tobacco with “total contradiction” for lobbying against anti-smoking regulations in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

A letter obtained by media dispatched by the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the country’s government ministers asks for plans to ban tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be abandoned or delayed.

The company is attempting amendments to a proposed legislation that include decreasing the recommended coverage of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on flavored smoking items, and watered-down penalties for any firms breaking the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“If I was a politician, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and perpetuate the death of the Zambian people,” stated the anti-tobacco campaigner.

Thousands of residents a year pass away from tobacco-related illnesses, according to WHO calculations.

The advocate mentioned the letter was believed to have been distributed to various ministerial offices and was in distribution within community advocacy networks.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

It comes amid expanded apprehension about corporate intervention with public health regulations. Last month, WHO officials issued a warning that the smoking product companies was increasing attempts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“Evidence exists of industry lobbying globally. Tobacco company fingerprints are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN summit conference,” commented the tobacco industry watchdog.

Likely impacts

“If a tobacco control measure isn’t passed because of this letter, the cost might be borne in human lives who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The anti-smoking legislation being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and mandating that pictorial cautions cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

In the letter, BAT suggests this be decreased to less than half “according to global guideline limits”, deferred for no less than twelve months after the law is enacted.

International experts actually suggests a alert needs to encompass at least half of the product container front “and seek to occupy as much of the principal display areas as possible”. Within Britain, warnings need to encompass nearly two-thirds of a product container sides.

Flavored tobacco discussion

The corporation requests the elimination of comprehensive limitations on flavoured tobacco products, suggesting that it would push consumers toward “illegally traded” products. The corporation recommends prohibiting a smaller list of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.

The proposed legislation proposes sanctions for multiple violations “varying from a portion of yearly revenue to a decade in prison”.

Business explanation

Via documentation, the corporate leader of the Zambian branch states the company is dedicated to good corporate behaviour” and “endorses the aims of governments to lower tobacco use and the associated health impact” but maintains that “some regulations can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Critic response

Chimbala said BAT’s proposed changes would “undermine this law so much that the required influence for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that many such provisions existed in the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “complete contradiction”, he commented.

“We live in a global village. When I cultivate smoking products in my back yard and collect the yield and sell it out – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to benefit personally and all the subsequent offspring while my neighbour’s children are succumbing … is in itself absolute spiritual failure.”

Tobacco control legislation in the UK or elsewhere had not resulted in corporate closures, the campaigner stated. “Legislation never shuts down the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Standard business position

The company representative said: “The company operates its operations according with relevant national regulations. Further, the corporation engages in the country’s legislative process in line with the relevant frameworks which allow for interested party involvement in policymaking.”

The firm positioned itself as “not opposed to regulation”, the spokesperson stated, mentioning that young individuals should be shielded from obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We advocate for progressive regulation to achieve intended population health targets, while recognizing the range of rights and obligations on industry, consumers and related stakeholders,” the spokesperson stated, adding that BAT’s proposals “represent the situation of the Zambian market and cigarette sector, which involves increasing amounts of illegal commerce”.

The country's office of trade, commerce and industry was solicited for statement.