🔗 Share this article

Only two days before the NYC mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange issued a bold electoral prediction – going beyond who would win citywide, and precinct by precinct. The analyst, a political analyst born and raised in the city, devoted over a decade in progressive politics and emerged as something of a well-known figure recently for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and polling.

He published his highly detailed forecast map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate would win while missing Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his Substack, the Narrative War. Lange has a flair for clever terms. He highlighted, as an example, the divide between the “commie corridor”, stretching from Park Slope to another area to a third locale, where he forecasted (correctly) that Mamdani would win by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal surpass the New York Times” in audience and most voters favored the independent, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Patterns and Surprises

What was your night?

I had to do that because they were adding around 200,000 votes into the tally every few minutes! I felt somewhat anxious at the beginning: Mamdani was ahead the initial ballots by 12 points, but there were large groups of votes added after that and his lead dropped from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

Understand, it was possible where election day went somewhat badly for Mamdani, in which Cuomo was going to end up basically increasing his support from the Democratic primary. However the winner gained half a million votes to his initial base, and this was critical why he won. He campaigned and massively expanded his support from the first round.

Expanding Support

How did Mamdani gain those extra votes from?

He assembled the coalition that progressives long aimed for: it’s multiracial, youthful, tenants and individuals facing cost pressures. He gained significantly with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the earlier election. Additionally he boosted his base of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He built the alliance that the left always wanted to build: multiracial, youthful, tenants and people struggling with costs

Additionally, there were a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It is a genuine phenomenon, confined to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Islamic voters. Electors in immigrant strongholds that went for Trump last year backed the progressive now. However it’s not that he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Impact

One of the big stories of the election was the record participation. Who benefited?

Both sides. Turnout was much greater than I had expected. I thought it could exceed two million, but it reached 2.3M – that is a lot of darn voters. There was a decent anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that was enough to secure victory.

You predicted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Currently it appears he’s likely to get over half. He’s at just over 50% but remain around 200K ballots left to report as of Wednesday morning. So I don’t think certain, but I think it’s likely, and I hope he achieves it because afterwards none can claim the Republican was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His support completely collapsed.

He didn’t win any district in any area. Not even Tottenville in the borough, which is like an highly conservative area. That really surprised me. Cuomo held very white areas, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added all of these conservatives on the island who had a strong turnout. I think there was a lot of strategic balloting by the Republicans. This happened prior to the former president tweeted his support for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome if the winning alliance failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

Regarding your often-discussed “commie corridor” – did backing for the candidate dominant in those areas of the boroughs?

I think existed a little dilution of the progressive zone in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, instance, the property owners and homeowners supported Cuomo. Thus there existed some opposition. However overall, largely the commie corridor is another huge reason why Zohran won – he scored between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the election we reported on if Mamdani was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he succeeded?

Exist neighborhoods with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – like specific locales – where he did well. However in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Manhattan area, his position on Israel definitely mattered there. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they all leaned Cuomo. Plus, you have newcomers from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, they were strongly supportive. So I don’t know if there were crazy narrative-busters here, but Mamdani retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and including sections of the another locale by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what the city represents in politics? Will progressive base become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest political leaders from the left come from a few areas in the boroughs. I believe that there will be more of that – candidates will emerge from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

But I think that each urban center in the US can have their own commie corridor. Cities are the epicenters of leftwing power in the nation – because youth reside there, people rent and they are places where people are crushed by the inequalities we face.