🔗 Share this article

The most significant jump-scare the movie business has witnessed in 2025? The return of horror as a leading genre at the UK film market.

As a genre, it has impressively outperformed past times with a 22% rise compared to last year for the UK and Irish box office: over £83 million this year, against £68 million the previous year.

“Previously, zero horror films made £10 million in the UK or Ireland. Currently, five have surpassed that mark,” comments a box office editor.

The big hits of the year – Weapons (£11.4m), Sinners (£16.2 million), the latest Conjuring installment (£14.98m) and 28 Years Later (£15.54m) – have all remained in the multiplexes and in the public consciousness.

Even though much of the professional discussion highlights the singular brilliance of prominent auteurs, their successes indicate something evolving between audiences and the genre.

“Many have expressed, ‘You should watch this even if horror isn’t your thing,’” says a film distribution executive.

“Such movies experiment with style and format to produce entirely fresh content, connecting with viewers on a new level.”

But outside of creative value, the steady demand of horror movies this year indicates they are giving audiences something that’s much needed: catharsis.

“Right now, there’s a lot of anger, fear and division that’s being reflected in cinema,” observes a genre expert.

“Scary movies excel at tapping into viewers' fears, amplifying them, allowing you to set aside daily worries and concentrate on the on-screen terror,” remarks a respected writer of horror film history.

Against a current events featuring geopolitical strife, enforcement actions, extremist rises, and ecological disasters, witches, zombies and vengeful spirits connect in new ways with viewers.

“It’s been noted that vampire cinema thrives during periods of economic hardship,” says an star from a popular scary movie.

“This symbolizes the way modern economies can exhaust human spirit.”

From film's inception, societal turmoil has shaped horror.

Experts point to the boom of German expressionism after the the Great War and the unstable environment of the post-war Germany, with films such as early expressionist works and Nosferatu: A Symphony of Horror.

Subsequently came the economic crisis of the 30s and Universal Studios’ Frankenstein and The Wolfman.

“Take Dracula: it depicts an Eastern European figure invading Britain, spreading a metaphorical infection that endangers local protagonists,” explains a historian.

“So it reflects a lot of anxieties around immigration.”

The boogeyman of border issues shaped the just-premiered folk horror a recent film title.

Its writer-director explains: “My goal was to examine populist trends. For instance, nostalgic phrases promising a return to a 'better' era that excluded many.”

“Secondly, the idea that you could be with someone you know and then suddenly they blurt out something round the dinner table or in a Facebook post and you’re like, ‘Where did that come from?’”

Maybe, the current era of praised, culturally aware scary films began with a sharp parody released a year after a polarizing administration.

It ushered in a recent surge of visionary directors, including several notable names.

“Those years were remarkably vibrant,” says a filmmaker whose movie about a murderous foetus was one of the era’s tentpole movies.

“I believe it initiated a trend toward eccentric, high-concept horror that aimed for artistic recognition.”

This creator, now penning a fresh horror script, notes: “During the past decade, viewers have become more receptive to such innovative approaches.”

Simultaneously, there has been a reappraisal of the underrated horror works.

Recently, a new cinema opened in London, showing underground films such as a quirky horror title, a classic adaptation and the 1989 remake of the expressionist icon.

The fresh acclaim of this “gritty and loud” genre is, according to the venue creator, a direct reaction to the formulaic productions churned out at the cinemas.

“This responds to the sterile output from major studios. Today's cinema is safer and more repetitive. Many popular movies feel identical,” he explains.

“In contrast [these alternative films] are a bit broken. It’s like they’ve erupted out of someone’s subconscious and been planted out there without corporate interference.”

Fright flicks continue to challenge the norm.

“Horror possesses a dual nature, feeling both classic and current simultaneously,” notes an authority.

Besides the revival of the mad scientist trope – with multiple versions of a literary masterpiece on the horizon – he anticipates we will see fright features in the coming years reacting to our present fears: about tech supremacy in the coming decades and “supernatural elements in political spheres”.

Meanwhile, a religious-themed scare film a forthcoming title – which tells the story of Mary and Joseph’s struggles after the messiah's arrival, and stars celebrated stars as the sacred figures – is planned for launch soon, and will definitely send a ripple through the faith-based groups in the America.</