I'm a Hardcore Capitalist, Yet Medicare for All Represents the Optimal Hope for American Healthcare

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Fixed payment. Shared insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Medical advisors. ACA. HMO. PPO. Exclusive Provider Organization. Point of Service. HDHP. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. SHOP. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? You should be. Who comprehends this complex system? Not the typical business owner. Neither the average employee. Choosing the right medical coverage for our business – or for our families – appears to require it requires advanced expertise in healthcare.

The Medical System Is More Than Complex, It's Costly

Based on recent research, the average family spends $27,000 annually for their health insurance (up 6% from last year). The average employer health insurance cost is projected to surpass $seventeen thousand per employee in 2026, a 9.5% jump from 2025.

Now the government has ceased functioning due to political disagreements over subsidies which analysts predict could cause a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Will We Seriously Consider National Health Insurance?

When will we seriously consider a national health insurance program in the United States? I have to believe we're approaching that point since this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm proposing for our current Medicare system – an established insurance framework – simply expand to cover everyone. Our infrastructure remains intact. The way medical professionals receive payment would change. Believe me, they'll adapt.

How National Health Insurance Would Work

Universal healthcare coverage would require payments from both workers and companies. In comparable systems, an employee earning average wages must contribute about 5.3% to their healthcare. The company must contribute about thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this seem like a lot? Unless you compare it to what average American pays. I can name dozens of clients who are easily contributing between 8% to 15% of payroll costs for medical benefits. Remember that in comprehensive systems, these contributions include retirement benefits, sick pay, maternity leave and unemployment benefits along with supporting medical services. When including those costs compared with what we pay on retirement programs, job loss coverage and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Execution for America

In the US, universal healthcare funding would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a system already established. It ought to be means-based – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than those earning less. This includes both worker and company payments. Similar to many federal defense, IT, welfare services and infrastructure, the system could be managed to third-party administrators instead of a government office.

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage would be a huge benefit for small businesses such as my company. It would place small companies in equal competition against big corporations who can afford better plans. It would render management much easier (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to social security and healthcare taxes, instead of separate payments to insurance companies and insurance providers).

It would enable it easier for us to budget annual expenditures, instead of enduring the complicated (and fruitless) process of negotiating with the big insurance providers required annually every year. Because it's simplified, there would be improved comprehension about benefits among workers – contrasted with the current system which require them to interpret the complications of existing plans. And there would definitely exist less liability for companies since we wouldn't have access to our employees' medical records for risk assessment and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as pro-market as they get. But I've learned that government play important functions in society, including national security to supporting needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage for everyone through a national insurance system strengthens economic foundations. It represents superior, simpler approach for entrepreneurs that employ the majority of the country's workers and fund half the economic output. It makes it possible for workers to enjoy better health, come to work more often and be more productive.

Considering Challenges

Exist a million considerations I haven't covered? Certainly. But with rising medical expenses experienced in recent years, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning very well. I understand that we're not a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms can be readily adopted. However extending universal Medicare, even with the additional taxes required, would still be a better and more affordable strategy for not only controlling healthcare costs but providing access to everyone.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, must tone down national pride. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. We rank well below numerous nations with the best healthcare in the world, based on comprehensive research. Maybe one positive aspect amid present circumstances is that we take a hard look at ourselves and agree that big changes are necessary.

John Diaz
John Diaz

A seasoned casino gaming analyst with over a decade of experience in slot machine mechanics and online gambling strategies.

Popular Post